took place on Friday the Guarantee Commission to evaluate the correspondence between the addresses passed by the City Council and the action carried out by the Administration with the dissemination of the Call for expressions of interest on the regeneration project in the neighborhood Mirabello. During the same meeting it
should also discuss the right to deny access to the records of fact, in this case by the accountable manager and the Arch Magnani Gnoni Attorney (legal services of the City) and Colin (external consultant).
First Assessor Spadoni challenged the legality of the Commission stating that if he had discussed the documents in the case would go away.
The Commission took place in full respect of its functions and responsibilities and put questions to which the Councillor and the Director Magnani has eluded literally running away from the classroom.
Furthermore none of the PD claimed, even after he left the session in the company of executives and Magnani Gnoni, il Consigliere Scarpino lo ha sconfessato conclamando la piena legittimità della seduta.
Uno show indegno da parte di un Assessore politicamente analfabeta di democrazia e rispetto degli organi istituzionali: evidentemente Spadoni ha paura di discutere degli atti dell’Amministrazione.
L’aspetto più grave è che ben due Dirigenti, sui tre presenti, lo abbiano seguito compiendo politicamente un atto istituzionalmente irriguardoso e politicamente di parte senza precedenti: ma d’altronde sono gli stessi, Arch. Magnani e Avv. Gnoni, che hanno negato di fatto il diritto dei consiglieri a visionare gli atti, ergendosi per tanto ad arbitri del compimento del mandato politico-amministrativo dei Consiglieri.
It is no coincidence, because politically the fact that the refusal of the directors to carry out their mandate, which was awarded by popular vote instead of the three parties concerned who are appointed by the Mayor, the Board has been premeditated own Delrio.
fact answering a question right on our event Mirabello, Spadoni, on behalf of the Executive Delrio, declared with 20 rounds ahead of what was then prepared by Magnani, that "access will be deferred in order not to compromise the equal treatment of all proposers.
Reasons inconsistent but make it clear that the executives did not act independently, ma su precisa indicazione della Giunta!
Siamo all’emergenza democratica?
In questa città non si è mai visto un atteggiamento del genere di cui l’unico responsabile è il Sindaco, per il quale evidentemente la democrazia e la trasparenza sono uno slogan.
La giurisprudenza in merito è copiosa e consolidata: i Consiglieri comunali non hanno alcun limite di accesso agli atti, semmai debbono attenersi al segreto in determinati specifici casi.
Con questo comportamento si crea un precedente pericoloso: cosa accadrà con i prossimi progetti relativi alle ex Reggiane o all’Area Nord considerato che Delrio ha deciso di esautorare il legittimo titolare della pianificazione, l’Assessore Ferrari, leaving the field open to the faithful Spadoni?
is possible that the planning of an entire district is made by private agreement in a secret room and that the elected representatives of people can not perform their functions?
Just as the City Council has undertaken to analyze the proceedings of the PSC?
The issue will arrive in the City Council, because the whole process related to the Mirabello has betrayed the addresses passed by the City Council, to the exclusion of other things throughout the stage of popular participation.
Not only because the silence of PD remains strong even exclusion relating to voice and lies of the Director in charge of the proceedings, according to which the relevant envelope was white when in fact reported a stamp backdated.
The embarrassment of the Directors of PD was palpable, the right to access many expressed considerations devoted to transparency, the parent Vecchi, while admitting it did not follow the proceedings, said the need for an assessment on: let's see if they are able to bring to reason that the ultras cattocomunisti exchange for the City an affable private.
Certainly our battle goes on, because at stake is not simply the taking of a vision document, but the principle of safeguarding the rights of the people elected to control the Administration, which is nothing but the translation of democratic principles, for this evaluation also the possibility of an appeal to the TAR.
0 comments:
Post a Comment